Saturday, February 23, 2008

Sorry, Geeks: Tablet PCs Still Can't Beat Regular Pen and Paper

By writing this article, I have probably put myself on the “hit list” of every Tablet PC enthusiast. James Kendrick runs a great site called jkOnTheRun. Hugo Ortega runs a site at Uber Tablet. There are also a lot of sites that support the UMPC (ultra mobile pc), a mini Tablet PC that has pretty much bombed despite some attractive features. Even though the Tablet PC platform that was introduced in 2002 has yet to become mainstream, it still has a strong cult following.

A Tablet PC is a notebook (sometimes slate-shaped) mobile computer. Its touch screen or digitizing tablet technology allows the user to operate the computer with a stylus or digital pen. Most tablets today allow the user to use the keyboard like a regular notebook, but also allow for the screen to be turned and “folded back” so the unit resembles a notebook. Tablet PC computers usually have less memory and omit other features which similarly priced notebooks have. They are somewhat popular in the business world, where people can substitute their tablet for pen and paper. But is it really a substitute?
I entered the Tablet PC world in May of 2006 when I purchased the first ultra mobile Tablet PC, the Samsung Q1. Writing on this was very uncomfortable since the letters would vector themselves into outrageous shapes if I happened to touch the screen while I was writing. The actual handwriting appearance was completely annoying as the writing would appear “squiggly” as I inked a word, but straighten itself out afterwards. The promising new Sony UX Micro PC series didn’t help the situation either. While the screen on these computers had a resolution that made everything look razor sharp, the actual digitizer (which operates at a different resolution) must have had a total resolution of about 5 pixels. Try inking on it and you’ll know what I mean.

At the end of the year, Fujitsu came out with what seemed to be the perfect pen and paper replacement: the P1610D tablet. Not only was this tablet about the size of a paperback book, but it also employed a technology that allowed the user to rest his/her palm on the screen while writing. Unfortunately, early releases of this tablet had calibration problems and when the processor was very active, inking became quite painful.
Luckily, Fujitsu also released the T4215 series, an active tablet (which requires a special kind of stylus pen) that has a gorgeous (but somewhat grainy) screen, DVD writer, and other attractive features. While the T4215 makes a great notebook (and it is priced far more than other notebooks with similar features), it is just too heavy to take with you and write whenever you want. Putting it on your lap is also the equivalent of going out in the hot sun and flashing a huge magnifying class on your legs. You get the point!
Two months ago, HP got into the game with its very affordable TX1000 Entertainment PC, which also works as a tablet. Everything looks great until you try and ink on this. The horrifying experience is equivalent to writing on a pad of paper with a pen that is running out of ink. After using this for an hour, I actually considered smashing it against the wall.
Luckily, Fry’s Electronics allows computer returns without a 15% restocking fee. I thought that perhaps I expected too much from this absolute piece of junk and was happy to find out that they had received five returns of the same exact computer that day. To be fair to HP, this computer is advertised as an “Entertainment PC” rather than a “Tablet PC.” It’s entertaining enough if you just make sure to look at the screen at a completely straight angle. Otherwise, the screen looks undersaturated.

My final attempt was an OQO Model 02, which I reviewed very favorably a couple weeks back. The fact that this mini computer didn’t have a slot for the stylus, as well as the slow processor creating lag time when inking, made this computer useless for my inking needs. While I was very impressed with the screen at first, I noticed it looked quite different at other angles. Luckily, someone on eBay bought it for almost the full amount I had paid. After shipping the unit to the lucky (as long as he’s not using it as a tablet) new owner, I felt a sense of frustration. “What’s next?” I asked myself and the answer didn’t hit me until I arrived at the office the next morning.

I noticed a plain white binder that almost seemed to be trying to communicate to me. Instantly, my mind had flashbacks of the days before I became a tablet geek: buying smooth, ball point pens; being able to read without having a screen glare back in my face; and knowing that all my writing would be there without having to press a “save” button.
I remembered how much more simple those days were, especially knowing that my notes would be right in front of me whenever I wanted. I converted my Windows Journal and Microsoft OneNote files into PDFs, and printed everything out that I needed for work. Luckily, I had easy access to a hole puncher. My next duty was to find folder tabs. I labeled one tab “admin,” the other, “tasks,” and another “general information.” I thought of a couple more categories but wanted to keep it simple. I then filed each page under the tab that matched it the most.
While rapidly snapping in the pages, I was reminded of how much time I’ve wasted this past year on Tablet PCs. My life could have been so much more productive had I not purchased so many tablets, lost sleep over the excitement of their arrival the next day, being frustrated because they didn’t meet my needs, and going through the hassle to return them. I decided to make up for that time by buying a beautiful Sony notebook, the new FZ140E, which I’ll review in another article. I can’t write on this thing, but for a price much cheaper than most of the tablets I purchased, it has a far better screen, a more useful keyboard, a faster DVD writer, more memory, better speakers, etc.
Some may argue that a pen and paper may be great, but they need something where they can view their most important information wherever they go. This, my friends, is what a Smartphone or PDA phone is for. Every cell phone carrier has at least five phones that have thumb keyboards, organizers, Internet access, email access, word processing, etc. I’m using a Motorola Q right now, which feels like a small bar of thin soap. Before that, I had the Treo 700p and countless others throughout the years. On all these phones, I have installed Microsoft Word-compatible software that allows easy synching between my mobile device and my laptop.
Now, I’ve decided to take it a little further. On the phone, I have put the following folders: Work; Personal; Bills; Blogs; Computer. I’m going to use these folders to put only the most important information I write down on pen and paper each day, such as passwords, information about one of my company's products, how to use certain features of all my graphic design software, etc. I will always have this information at my fingertips and on my computer, whenever I sync the phone to it. For those who want to be more on the cutting edge, you can now sync Microsoft OneNote files with your windows mobile device even adding pictures and sounds to your notes.
Tablet PC enthusiasts are living in a dream world. They may think they are cool by writing on a computer screen with a digital pen; it certainly garners them attention. They may think they are cool because they can use a computer without typing. They also think they are ahead of ordinary geeks because they can velcro their tablets to their car dashboards and use them as GPS machines, or even media players. What good is this if the battery life on most tablets running advanced applications lasts them about as long as Paris Hilton’s singing career? I understand their dream world as I was once a part of it. For now, just give me plain old paper and a nice pen!

Satire: Other "Illegals" Demand Amnesty


originally published at blogcritics.org on May 22, 2007

This past week, Democrats and Republicans agreed on a deal that would grant amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants. Unfortunately, this amnesty has opened a can of worms. In the past day alone, pedophiles, murderers, and thieves who are either in prison or charged with crimes will organize and demand that they are given their due respect. NAMBLA (North American Man Boy Love Association) members will march this Saturday while NAAM (National Association of American Murderers) will march on Sunday. On June 8, the KCRA (Kleptomaniacs Civil Rights Association) will March and demand that they be allowed to steal. All three of these groups have been endorsed by Dan Rather, Rosie O’Donnell, Hillary Clinton, Al Sharpton, and Guadalupe Santiago.
Steve Sodomheim, the director of NAMBLA, claims that it’s about time society accepts men who love boys. “We are not criminals; we are human!” Sodomheim says. During their march, they will demand that male teachers be allowed to have affairs with their male students as well as demand that all libraries be stocked with men-on-boy porn. They will also demand that government documents be written in their new man-on-boy language, Pedophilish. Although they have received endorsement from most Democrats, former Representative Mark Foley is the only Republican that has signed on, indicating his full support of NAMBLA.
O.J. Simpson, the new President of NAAM (National Association of American Murderers) claims that murderers aren’t really bad people. “We are actually doing a service to society by getting rid of people who don’t contribute,” he claims. When asked why some of the most promising people in society get murdered, he claimed, “Well, we are actually doing a service to them as well. Since they are good people, we send them to heaven early on.” Mr. Simpson and other members of NAAM are not only demanding that murderers be released from prison, but that they be allowed to murder at least three people a week.
“We do the jobs that nobody wants,” Zach Dahmer, another NAAM member declares. “I’m sure that there are a lot of people that others want to murder, but they are too afraid to!” Former Democrat Representative Gary Condit has donated over 5 million dollars to NAAM’s cause and will be participating in the march.
Winona Ryder started the KCRA (Kleptomaniacs Civil Rights Association) six years ago, after being arrested for stealing materials from a clothing store in Beverly Hills. “We are not actually thieves," Mrs. Ryder states. “We are taking back what rightfully belongs to us!” Aaron McDowell, a prominent member of CCRA , considers himself an American Indian given that his great grandfather was 1/8 American Indian.

“They stole from me centuries ago,” claims Mr. McDowell. “So, I’m just getting back at society for repressing me,” he continues. Oprah Winfrey has proudly given her support. KCRA plans a Kleptomaniacs Pride Week where they will walk into stores and steal whatever they want. Police officers who try and interfere will be punished. Alec Baldwin and Los Angeles Mayor, Antonio Villaraigosa, are the main organizers for this event.

True Americans, such as Bill O’Reilly, have been very vocal about the possible amnesty. “First we have illegal immigrants who broke our immigration laws being granted amnesty. Then, men who have sex with little boys want to roam free. Now, we have murderers and Kleptomaniacs demanding “respect?” What’s next, allowing sexual harassment at the workplace?" R&B singer R. Kelly is equally upset.

“Some of these people actually have sex with underage children and videotape it. This is wrong!” Mr. Kelly claims. Along with rapper Akon, R. Kelly has pushed Congress into passing harsher laws against people who have sex with minors. Perhaps R. Kelly and Akon might want to refrain. The Senate, dominated by Democrats such as Ted Kennedy, is working on the Pedophile Amnesty Bill as we speak.

What I Like About Tom Cruise

originally published at blogcritics.org on May 10, 2007

Ever since jumping on Oprah’s couch like a maniac in June of 2005, Tom Cruise has become the most vilified actor in the world. When you hear the name “Tom Cruise” these days, it is most likely the topic of a joke. Never has an actor fallen from the top so quickly without committing a crime. What babies did one of the greatest actors of the past three decades murder in order to earn such harsh treatment?

Many point to Cruise’s involvement in the Church of Scientology as the main reason for his so-called downfall. How ironic it is that many of the same people who criticize his religious beliefs belong to mainstream religions in which children are molested, wars are started, and crazy ideals are shoved down our throats.

In comparison, Cruise’s beliefs that aliens are popping negative thoughts into our heads seems harmless. As a supporter of drugs for people who have mental illnesses, I do find his argument that these drugs are useless somewhat offensive, but I am not about to boycott his films. I didn’t see the last Mission Impossible movie because I think the series is boring and a waste of Mr. Cruise’s talents.

The one other issue people have with Cruise is his sexuality. Let’s face it: I think he is as queer as a three dollar bill, but if he wants to use women such as Mimi Rogers, Nicole Kidman, and Katie Holmes and throw them back to the prop department when he’s finished, that’s his business, not ours. Unlike many other (I think) closeted famous people, he was never on television speaking out against gay issues. I think perhaps he is just not ready to deal with his sexuality yet, so leave him alone!

Even if Cruise has shown an unlikable side of himself, it does nothing to erase his body of work, which is very impressive: Risky Business, Top Gun, The Color of Money, Rain Man, Born on the Fourth of July, A Few Good Men, Jerry Maguire, and Collateral. He brings charisma and feeling to all his characters in a way that most actors can only dream of. Even such poorly scripted movies, such as Minority Report and War of the Worlds, are only watchable because he is in them – so why the backlash?

Cruise has entered the Britney Spears, Ben Affleck, Michael Jackson, J-Lo, and Madonna Celebrity Backlash Zone where people love to take entertainers, turn them into icons of an almost Godlike status, and then drop them like a ball of fire. It’s a fun sport for the general public, but can be emotionally draining for the star that is involved. Cruise may be everybody’s whipping target now, but you can almost bet Brad Pitt will replace him soon. Who will we backlash after that in order to set off our secret desires of seeing a famous person fall - Tom Hanks?

What happened with Cruise is simple: we liked him and wanted him to succeed. Then, he became too successful. We looked at him and, instead of feeling proud of him we felt envy. Many looked at their own miserable lives and realized they have not set their goals or used their talents in the way Cruise has. We had to find a flaw in him (Scientology) and blow it way out of proportion in order to make him look bad. Congratulations, we can all now feel so much better about ourselves!

OQO Model O2: A Mobile Geek's Dream Come True

Originally published at Blogcritics.org on May 2, 2007


Handheld computing devices have been around for the longest time, even though they didn’t become mainstream until the later part of the 1990s. Remember the Apple Newton, which was supposed to recognize your own handwriting and substitute for a personal assistant? Remember the Windows CE computers of the early 90s that were advertised as tiny computers that you can actually put in your pocket, despite the fact the battery life was awful and they hardly contained any memory?

In the late 1990s, the PDA (personal digital assistant) was mainstreamed and they were developed enough to the point where they actually became helpful. Then, in 2000, the groundbreaking Ipaq Pocket PC was released, with a Windows like operating system and wireless capabilities that made communication a lot easier. Although these devices were useful, they were, in no way, a substitute for a real pocket sized computer that you can have access to whenever you need it.

In 2004, Sony released its U Series paperback book sized computers that were eye candy for geeks and love at first site for mobile professionals. This stylus enabled Windows XP computer ran on either a Celeron 900 MHz (U50) or Pentium M 1GHz Centrino processor (U70), a 20 gig hard drive and 256 or 512 megs of RAM. I used it as a portable video player, which was great because you can run almost any type of video file in Windows XP. However, it wasn’t perfect. As with other mobile devices, battery life was less than optimal and the passive digitizer certainly wasn’t made for note taking.

In the past year, several new UMPC (Ultra Mobile Portable Computer) devices have been introduced. The first one to come to the market was the Samsung Q1 which seemed like the dream device when initially looking at it and listening to the excellent portable speakers, but ultimately failed its target audience. Not only is the battery life on this device about as long as William Hung’s musical career, but it screams for a thumboard since the tablet pc input is pretty much useless. Luckily, Samsung is addressing these issues on their new device, which should be available in the next month.

In mid-2006, Sony released its UX series, which had an absolutely beautiful screen, decent Intel Core Solo processor, and came with an excellent docking station that actually made the computer useful as a desktop replacement. During my brief affair with the UX380 (the one with Windows Vista), I was able to capture video and edit it with no major problems. Pretty impressive computer, right? Unfortunately, Sony forgot that people might want to actually type on this thing and included a non-tactile feedback thumboard that is not only useless, but also painful to use. One would think that Sony would be the first manufacturer to get the ultra mobile computer completely right, but they completely jumped the shark on this one.

In late 2004, a San-Francisco based company, OQO, released the first actual PC computer that one can fit into a pocket. It featured a very slow 1 GHz Transmeta Crusoe processor, 20 GB hard drive, and 256 MB of RAM. It included USB 1.1, FireWire 400, a headphone port, and a built-in microphone, integrated 802.11b wireless radio, as well as Bluetooth. This OQO used a magnetic stylus with a magnetically sensitive 800x480 transflective screen. Some reviewers complained about the lack of power and memory while others, who didn’t expect this device to actually replace their other PCs, were fascinated.

The OQO model 01+ was announced and released on September 27, 2005. Representing an incremental update to the model 01, the OQO model 01+ featured a 30 GB hard drive, 512 MB of RAM, USB 2.0, and an internal speaker. It also added support for portrait display mode (480x800) and had a redesigned screen bezel intended to improve the accuracy of its tablet. Still, people asked for more power and just recently, OQO has answered the dreams and prayers us mobile enthusiasts everywhere.
The OQO Model 02 was recently released to the public and demand has been so high that many distributors have not been able to fulfill preorders that were taken since January. This item comes in many flavors with the lowest cost model having a 1.2 Ghz Via processor, 512 mb ram, 30 gb hard drive, and running Windows XP Home Edition while the highest costing model has a 1.5 gh Via processor, 1gh ram, 60 gb hard drive, Sprint or Verizon high speed EVDO wireless capabilities, and running Windows Vista Business. All models feature built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth wireless capabilities.

I have a higher end model which comes with Windows XP Professional and Sprint EVDO. Even though it took hours to upgrade my new OQO Model 02 to Windows Vista Business, the results are spectacular. I don’t recall being this fascinated by a device since getting the very first iPod. This device has not only become my email and web browsing machine, but an excellent portable video player (with accepts video files though my Tivo), an excellent notetaking machine (you will need to buy your own Wacom enabled pen), an excellent mp3 player, and a great photo viewer as well.
While the OQO Model 02 may not run as fast as the new Sony UX series, this machine is far more useful because of its excellent thumboard, the best one I’ve seen yet. Not only is there great tactile feedback while pressing the buttons, but there are also separate buttons for numbers. Best of all, you don’t have to hold two keys when thumbing in an exclamation mark, question mark, etc. The “sticky keys” feature is already enabled so you press the function (or shift key) once, then press the key for your punctuation mark, function, etc.

One of the reasons that Ultra Mobile PCs have not been successful is because the screen size is usually too small for the eyes. On the OQO Model 2, you can easily zoom in on the screen when you need to. However, I find that I don’t have to do this. Windows Vista has a lot more features that are mobile friendly, including a feature that easily adjust the font size for the screen. With the new Internet Explorer 7, you can easily adjust the zoom level by pressing control and the “+” key. You can also permanently set the zoom level to anything you want on Internet Explorer. I find that the 115% zoom level works best on this.

Another problem with Ultra Mobile PCs has been that they heat up so badly that they feel more like portable heaters than portable computers. I have not had any major heat issues with the OQO Model 02 yet. It does get a little hot, but not uncomfortably so. To fix this problem, however, OQO had to include a high powering fan that sounds like a mini hair dryer when the processor is fully cranked up. This bothered me at first, but I have become very immune to the sound. Others may not.
OQO deserves a lot of credit for creating the first portable computer device that is not only useable, but can fit in your pocket as well. However, there are small improvements that can be made. Since the OQO Model 02 works best as a pen enabled device, you would think that there would be a slot on the device to put the pen on, but there isn’t.
Perhaps OQO needed to sacrifice some things to make this device as portable as possible, but I truly miss the pen slot and have lost my expensive Wacom pen at times. There have also been some issues that OQO Quality control could have prevented had they not been in such a rush to get this device out to the market. Several people have complained that their batteries either do not fit, or come off easily, from the back. I have easily fixed mine by doing some slight surgery on the metal latch it is attached to. However, one should not have to do this for a $2000 device!
There has also been some complaints about the docking station, which will run you a couple hundred dollars extra, not working. Most likely, these issues will be sorted out very soon and only people, such as myself, who jump on new technology the day it becomes available will have to deal with this.
In summary, the OQO Model 02 may be extremely expensive, but one can make great use of the money he/she spends on it: the pen capabilities will help keep you organized; the interface is very user friendly; it makes a great entertainment device; and the OQO Model 02 will help improve productivity in your business. Though it is extremely hard to find, Paul Maldonado, as well as the rest of the staff, at RCS Experience in NYC are very helpful, reliable and can have it shipped to you overnight with a variety of configurations. Thanks to OQO, all the “geeks” of the world can finally take a bow.

Rosie O'Donnell's Fascinating Oral Diarrhea

Originally published at Blogcritics.org on April 25, 2007


Rosie O’Donnell is one of the most disturbing, yet fascinating personas that ever existed. She pisses people off who deserve to be pissed off: Rupert Murdoch, Bill O’Reilly, George W. Bush, so-called “President of the Catholic League” William Donahue (a man who would be pissed off at almost anything), Donald Trump, Michelle Malkin, and many others.

This is not to say Rosie is completely innocent. She has what my family refers to as “oral diarrhea,” a disease my mother has embarrassed us with for years. People who have oral diarrhea, unlike normal thinking people, can’t stop themselves from saying whatever they are thinking.
There’s a part of the brain that filters thoughts out. This brain function doesn’t work with people like Rosie O’Donnell or my mother. It could get her in big trouble. This certainly hurt Imus, Michael Richards, and possibly Mel Gibson. Alcoholism played a more important role in Gibson’s rants, but oral diarrhea and alcoholism sometimes go hand in hand.
It is also obvious that Rosie O’Donnell, like millions of other Americans, suffers from depression. She is unable to sit still without opening her mouth and she is very irritable. Her moods jump from high to low in almost a minute. What’s fascinating about Rosie’s depression is that instead of self-loathing, which many people with depression experience, she loves herself a little too much. She especially loves to hear herself shout and tear down others who disagree with her. This was evident by her treatment of Tom Selleck, a member of the National Rifle Association, back in 1999.
Despite her odd behavior, Rosie O’Donnell is both entertaining and educating to watch. From loudly criticizing Elizabeth Hasselbeck for her age (she’s too young) to her 9/11 conspiracies, Rosie brings out the best and worst in all of us. She says what many of us are thinking, but are afraid to say.
At times, she unfairly represents liberals — such as her recent mocking of Chinese people as well as ridiculously accusing Kelly Ripa of being a homophobe — but she does what very few talk show hosts do: she makes you think! Even if you disagree with her, discussing Rosie can bring up some very long and interesting discussions.
If you are not an admirer of Rosie's big mouth, you have to admire her actions. She risks her career in order to live her life the way she wants. She was America’s greatest sweetheart in the mid and late 1990s. In the early part of the decade, she left her very successful show because she was sick of living a “lie,” even though most rational people already knew she was gay.
The wing nut Republicans, who have more respect for serial killers than people who happen to be gay, condemned her.

Even if you don’t agree with gay marriage, she had the guts to speak for ousted families and their children. Even if you don’t agree with gay culture, she showed that, like Ellen, being gay doesn’t mean you can’t have a successful family and career. Perhaps people like Republican Idol Mark Foley and Family Values Military Man, Cpl. Matt Sanchez, would have had an easier time in life if they had taken cues from Rosie.
Rosie deserves all the success she’s had over the past fifteen years. My only fear is that she doesn’t know where the line is drawn with what’s acceptable in her comments. We live in a society where people like to take others’ comments, whip them out of context (hello, Imus), and destroy that person with McCarthyist-like actions. She has already jumped on the line with her recent comments about 911. I can only hope she doesn’t pass the line because, once she does, there are many people waiting to destroy her – and television without Rosie O’Donnell would be very empty and depressing.

Sunday, April 22, 2007

Music Trivia For Those With No Lives: Hootie's Bad Review Gets Critic Fired

Do you actually think that every good or bad review you read of an album is genuine? We all know that some critics are predisposed to dislike a certain artist, so they are bound to give that artist a bad review. It's hard to be objective so there isn't anything morally offensive about that.

There is something offensive, however, if a record company arranges a good review with a magazine. Such is the case with Hootie and The Blowfish's Fairweather Johnson, which was released in Spring of 1996. The newly hired editor of Rolling Stone magazine, Jim DeRogatis, decided to be rather honest about his review, not realizing that he was going against Rolling Stone's prearanged deal with Atlantic Records. Rolling Stone head Jann Wenner, however, was furious that DeRogatis didn't write the originally planned good review of a band who's previous album had sold more than 10 million copies. Not only was DeRogatis's review replaced with a more favorable one, but the sometimes psychotic (but always fun to read) music critic was instantly shown his way out the door.

Jim DeRogatis was employed again at the Chicago Sun-Times. It appears that his inuition about Fairweather Johnson was correct since not only did the album completely bomb on the charts, but turned the band Hootie and The Blowfish into a complete joke. Rolling Stone Magazine, once the "it" magazine of the music world, has also become a joke.

Sunday, April 8, 2007

Music Trivia For Those With No Lives: George Michael's Deadly "I Want Your Sex."

Would you believe that a song like this would piss off conservatives so much that they would send death threats to both George Michael and Columbia records? Then again, this was 1987. Ronald Reagan was president and Jerry Falwell was one of the most respected men in America.

George Michael's "I Want Your Sex" shocked radio listeners. Columbia thought they had originally made a mistake because there were several radio stations who wouldn't play the song. It was kind of surprising given that Samantha Fox had just released "Touch Me" six months earlier. In any case, conservatives targeted George Michael and his record company. The death threats were never made public for obvious reasons, but radio station managers had to be made aware of what was happening. The situation got so bad that Columbia was going to pull the single, as well as the video that George Michael made of the song (a heavily edited version was eventually released).

The "I Want Your Sex" single, however, started to grow on people. The radio stations that played the song showed excellent call-out research. The song was the number one requested song on almost every station it was played on. The money that was to be made on this single was certainly more important than any death threats - at least that was the mindset of record exectutives at Columbia. The "I Want Your Sex" single climbed all the way to number 2 on Billboard's Hot 100 despite being banned by several radio stations. In reality, the song should have been number one for several weeks.

"I Want Your Sex" became the first of several hit singles from George Michael's Faith album, released in the Fall of 1987. It turned George Michael into the biggest singing sensation in the world. He far outsold Michael Jackson and Bruce Springsteen, who also released albums in the Fall of 1987. Unfortunately, George Michael has never come close to matching the worldwide success of the Faith album.